Re: [P1363:] HIBE Scheme
On May 27, 2009, at 2:11 AM, kobayashi.tetsutaro wrote:
Please notice that I am just proposing an HIBE schme, and not making
objection to proposing BBG/BB-HIBE.
Well, I am, to GS; unless there's a legacy need to standardize GS --
that is, if someone is actually using it -- then I believe it should
not be offered as an option.
I agree that we should add one pairing to the efficiency of GS-HIBE
that
I stated. However, GS-HIBE is as efficient as BBG/BB-HIBE, and is not
worse when t is small.
No, it's not; it's less efficient, even for t=1.
-hs.
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, mail LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the body of the message containing: SIGNOFF STDS-P1363-DISCUSS
Send any concerns to STDS-P1363-DISCUSS-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
or manage subscriptions at http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa
Visit IEEE P1363 on the web at: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363
______________________________________________________________________