Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [P1363:] HIBE Scheme



Hi

I agree with Hovav on this one.

Can you name an environment where GS is better? That is assuming
the implementor chooses correct security parameters and the most
modern and efficient pairing parameters for that setting. i.e.
some real values for all the parameters, choices of pairings
and hash-to-point functions.

Nigel

kobayashi.tetsutaro wrote:
I agree that we should add one pairing to the efficiency of GS-HIBE that
I stated.  However, GS-HIBE is as efficient as BBG/BB-HIBE, and is not
worse when t is small.
No, it's not; it's less efficient, even for t=1.

My claim is that GS-HIBE is more efficient under some environments.  For
example, BBG-HIBE scheme requires more number of pairings than GS-HIBE
in decryption when t is small.  If the smaller number of pairings in
decryption is the dominant factor of the efficiency of a system, then
GS-HIBE is more efficient.  All we can say is that BB/BBG-HIBE can be
more efficient than GS-HIBE under some environments, as well as GS-HIBE
can be under others.

I think there is no significant flaw in the GS-HIBE scheme that makes us
exclude it from this working draft.


On May 27, 2009, at 2:11 AM, kobayashi.tetsutaro wrote:

Please notice that I am just proposing an HIBE schme, and not making
objection to proposing BBG/BB-HIBE.
Well, I am, to GS; unless there's a legacy need to standardize GS -- that is, if someone is actually using it -- then I believe it should not be offered as an option.

I agree that we should add one pairing to the efficiency of GS-HIBE that
I stated.  However, GS-HIBE is as efficient as BBG/BB-HIBE, and is not
worse when t is small.
No, it's not; it's less efficient, even for t=1.

-hs.



--
Prof. Nigel P. Smart               | Phone: +44 (0)117 954 5163
Computer Science Department,       | Fax:   +44 (0)117 954 5208
Woodland Road,                     | Email: nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
University of Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK | URL:   http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nigel/

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, mail LISTSERV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with
the body of the message containing: SIGNOFF STDS-P1363-DISCUSS
Send any concerns to STDS-P1363-DISCUSS-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
or manage subscriptions at http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa
Visit IEEE P1363 on the web at: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363
______________________________________________________________________