Re: [P1363:] [P1363] Motion to revise AMP

["Whyte, William" <WWhyte@xxxxxxxx>]

This seems like a well-formed motion. Any seconders?

BTW, I won't start the vote on the motion until January
2nd, because people might be away. Same for the PAKZ
motion.

Cheers,

William

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taekyoung Kwon [mailto:tkwon@SEJONG.AC.KR] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 5:20 AM
> To: STDS-P1363@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [P1363:] [P1363] Motion to revise AMP
> 
> Dear Working Group,
> 
>  
> 
> I would like to replace my motion with the following.
> 
>  
> 
> Amend IEEE P1363.2 draft D22 in accordance
> 
>   with the document titled the follow-up of AMP Proposal, dated
> 
>  December 8, 2005, which is available at the P1363 web page.
> 
>  
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  
> 
> Taekyoung
> 
>  
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ________ To unsubscribe, mail LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG with 
> the body of the message containing: SIGNOFF STDS-P1363 Send 
> any concerns to STDS-P1363-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG, or 
> manage subscriptions at http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa 
> Visit IEEE P1363 on the web at: 
> http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363 
> ______________________________________________________________
> ________ 
> 

______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, mail LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG with
the body of the message containing: SIGNOFF STDS-P1363
Send any concerns to STDS-P1363-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG,
or manage subscriptions at http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa
Visit IEEE P1363 on the web at: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363
______________________________________________________________________