Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3

To: P1619-2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3
From: Shai Halevi <shaih@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:07:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <48575B79.5070700@cisco.com>
List-Help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=P1619-2>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20P1619-2>
List-Owner: <mailto:P1619-2-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:P1619-2-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:P1619-2-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <48575B79.5070700@cisco.com>
Reply-To: Shai Halevi <shaih@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Fabio, the pseudocode for EME2 in this version is still expressed in
bits, could you please replace it with the code that I sent to you
(which is in bytes)?

Thanks,

-- Shai

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com> wrote:
> Please find enclosed 1619.2 draft 3 for review during tomorrow's meeting.
>
> Fabio

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3
  - From: Fabio Maino
- Re: [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3
  - From: Shai Halevi

References:
- [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3
  - From: Fabio Maino

Prev by Date: [P1619-2] security rationale
Next by Date: [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3
Prev by thread: [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3
Next by thread: Re: [P1619-2] 1619.2 DRAFT 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread