Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[P1619-2] Do we need Clause 6.2 "Key Export format"

To: P1619-2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [P1619-2] Do we need Clause 6.2 "Key Export format"
From: Matt Ball <matt.ball@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:27:17 -0600
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=P1619-2>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20P1619-2>
List-owner: <mailto:P1619-2-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:P1619-2-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:P1619-2-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Reply-to: Matt Ball <matt.ball@xxxxxxxx>

Hi Folks,

Does anyone currently intended to support the XML-based key export format for P1619.2 as specified in Section 6.2 of P1619.2 Draft 6? If not, we may consider removing it and relying instead on P1619.3 to specify such formats.

--
Thanks!
-Matt

Matt Ball, IEEE P1619.x SISWG Chair
Cell: 303-717-2717
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewvball
http://www.mavaball.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [P1619-2] Do we need Clause 6.2 "Key Export format"
  - From: Robert A. (Bob) Lockhart

Prev by Date: [P1619-2] Fwd: [STDS-P1619] 1619.2 keywords
Next by Date: [P1619-2] SISWG Plenary Meeting information sent to P1619 e-mail reflector
Previous by thread: [P1619-2] SISWG Plenary Meeting information sent to P1619 e-mail reflector
Next by thread: Re: [P1619-2] Do we need Clause 6.2 "Key Export format"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread