Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [P1619-2] Byte vs. Octet

To: P1619-2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [P1619-2] Byte vs. Octet
From: Shai Halevi <shaih@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:46:23 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <ed843b100901081412x221c43fcvda76040333744ab7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=P1619-2>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20P1619-2>
List-owner: <mailto:P1619-2-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:P1619-2-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:P1619-2-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Organization: IBM
References: <ed843b100901081412x221c43fcvda76040333744ab7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Shai Halevi <shaih@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

I agree with Matt about using byte rather than octet. -- Shai

References:
- [P1619-2] Byte vs. Octet
  - From: Matt Ball

Prev by Date: [P1619-2] In person attendance at SISWG plenary meeting in Memphis.
Next by Date: Re: [P1619-2] Byte vs. Octet
Previous by thread: Re: [P1619-2] Byte vs. Octet
Next by thread: [P1619-2] In person attendance at SISWG plenary meeting in Memphis.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread