Re: [P1619-2] EME-2 additional test vector
Are there any volunteers who can cross-check these test vectors?
Most notably, we'll want someone to extract and verify the test vectors as
they appear in the draft, so that we can identify transcription errors.
We have caught errors this way in both the P1619 and P1619.1 standards, so I
think it is a valuable exercise.
I can do this. I did some but not all of
them already, but I only picked the ones that gave decent
minor point, I did notice that the case-to-case linking was inconsistent
(case 4 I think), this was to do with the test case ordering reversal that
happened between a legitimate C-file and the Annex C.2. For the spec, I'd set
the next case pointer to NULL everywhere, to avoid