Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
[P1619-3] Enterprise Storage Forum article gives P1619/.1/.3 a good review
To
:
P1619-3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: [P1619-3] Enterprise Storage Forum article gives P1619/.1/.3 a good review
From
: Matt Ball <
matt.ball@xxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Tue, 6 May 2008 11:18:06 -0600
List-Help
: <
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=P1619-3
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20P1619-3
>
List-Owner
: <
mailto:P1619-3-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-Subscribe
: <
mailto:P1619-3-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-Unsubscribe
: <
mailto:P1619-3-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
Reply-To
: Matt Ball <
matt.ball@xxxxxxxx
>
Hi All,
Drew Robb just published a very positive article on the P1619-series standards:
http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/continuity/features/article.php/3742881
--
Thanks!
Matt Ball, IEEE P1619.x SISWG Chair
M.V. Ball Technical Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 303-469-2469, Cell: 303-717-2717
http://www.mvballtech.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewvball
Prev by Date:
[P1619-3] Meeting announcement for discussing SISWG Operating Procedures on May 14th
Next by Date:
[P1619-3] Question about using RFC3852
Prev by thread:
[P1619-3] Meeting announcement for discussing SISWG Operating Procedures on May 14th
Next by thread:
[P1619-3] Comments for Draft 2 & Draft 3
Index(es):
Date
Thread