RE: FW: presentation to T10
Fabio, are you still willing to make this presentation?
John/Ralph/George, can a convenient slot for Fabio be opened at CAP next
week?
Thanks!
- Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Nixon, Bob
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:03 AM
To: 'Fabio Maino'
Cc: stds-p1619@majordomo.ieee.org; John Lohmeyer (E-mail); George
Penokie (E-mail); Ralph Weber (E-mail)
Subject: RE: FW: presentation to T10
If you can spare the time, the T10 CAP group would greatly appreciate it!
Many of them are already familiar with your good work in FC-SP.
- Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Fabio Maino [mailto:fmaino@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:27 PM
To: Nixon, Bob
Cc: stds-p1619@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: FW: presentation to T10
Bob
I could make it, from San Jose is less then 2 hours driving.
Fabio
At 02:26 PM 4/14/2004, Nixon, Bob wrote:
>Sent earlier today to an incorrectly defined "SISWG". Hope this works
better.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nixon, Bob
>Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:21 AM
>To: SISWG
>Cc: John Lohmeyer (E-mail); Ralph Weber (E-mail); George Penokie (E-mail)
>Subject: presentation to T10
>
>Pursuant to interest expressed at the SISWG meeting in Milpitas, I asked
>T10 leadership if they would like an introduction to the work of
>SISWG. They responded positively and suggested a presentation of 15
>minutes to half an hour on the goals and general approach of the design
>SISWG is developing. They felt that the Commands, Architectures, and
>Protocols (CAP) work group would be the right venue.
>
>CAP's next meeting is the afternoon of Tuesday May 4 and all day Wednesday
>May 5 in Seaside, California (just north of Monterey). Admitted that this
>may be a long trip for a short presentation, but if there is a SISWG
>member who is planning to attend T10 or who can commute down from San Jose
>for part of a day to give this introduction, it would be greatly valued.
>I'm sure that CAP would adjust its agenda for the convenience of the
>presenter, should travel be an issue.
>
>Is anyone able to pursue this opportunity? It may also be an opportunity
>to exchange views with the T10 folks on some issues SISWG has raised
>recently, such as modifiable block lengths, 16-byte block length
>granularity, and finding space for a crypotographic authenticator.
>
> - Bob Nixon