Re: Re: RE: FW: presentation to T10
Hi John,
here is tomorrow's presentation.
I'll see you tomorrow,
Fabio
At 09:46 AM 4/30/2004, John Lohmeyer wrote:
>Fabio,
>
>I've added an agenda item to the CAP working group for your presentation:
>
> 8.1 Overview of IEEE Security In Storage WG [Fabio Maino] {Tuesday p.m.}
>
>If possible, we would like to receive an electronic copy of your
>presentation to post on the T10 web site.
>Thanks!
>John
>
>
>At 4/29/2004 11:13 AM, Fabio Maino wrote:
>>At 11:00 AM 4/29/2004, Nixon, Bob wrote:
>>>Fabio, are you still willing to make this presentation?
>>
>>Yes, if it's possible to schedule the presentation on tuesday afternoon
>>it would be perfect for me. I don't need more then 20 minutes.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Fabio
>>
>>
>>>John/Ralph/George, can a convenient slot for Fabio be opened at CAP next
>>>week?
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>> - Bob
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Nixon, Bob
>>>Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:03 AM
>>>To: 'Fabio Maino'
>>>Cc: stds-p1619@majordomo.ieee.org; John Lohmeyer (E-mail); George
>>>Penokie (E-mail); Ralph Weber (E-mail)
>>>Subject: RE: FW: presentation to T10
>>>
>>>
>>>If you can spare the time, the T10 CAP group would greatly appreciate it!
>>>Many of them are already familiar with your good work in FC-SP.
>>>
>>> - Bob
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Fabio Maino [mailto:fmaino@cisco.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:27 PM
>>>To: Nixon, Bob
>>>Cc: stds-p1619@majordomo.ieee.org
>>>Subject: Re: FW: presentation to T10
>>>
>>>
>>>Bob
>>>I could make it, from San Jose is less then 2 hours driving.
>>>
>>>Fabio
>>>
>>>
>>>At 02:26 PM 4/14/2004, Nixon, Bob wrote:
>>> >Sent earlier today to an incorrectly defined "SISWG". Hope this works
>>>better.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >From: Nixon, Bob
>>> >Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:21 AM
>>> >To: SISWG
>>> >Cc: John Lohmeyer (E-mail); Ralph Weber (E-mail); George Penokie (E-mail)
>>> >Subject: presentation to T10
>>> >
>>> >Pursuant to interest expressed at the SISWG meeting in Milpitas, I asked
>>> >T10 leadership if they would like an introduction to the work of
>>> >SISWG. They responded positively and suggested a presentation of 15
>>> >minutes to half an hour on the goals and general approach of the design
>>> >SISWG is developing. They felt that the Commands, Architectures, and
>>> >Protocols (CAP) work group would be the right venue.
>>> >
>>> >CAP's next meeting is the afternoon of Tuesday May 4 and all day Wednesday
>>> >May 5 in Seaside, California (just north of Monterey). Admitted that this
>>> >may be a long trip for a short presentation, but if there is a SISWG
>>> >member who is planning to attend T10 or who can commute down from San Jose
>>> >for part of a day to give this introduction, it would be greatly valued.
>>> >I'm sure that CAP would adjust its agenda for the convenience of the
>>> >presenter, should travel be an issue.
>>> >
>>> >Is anyone able to pursue this opportunity? It may also be an opportunity
>>> >to exchange views with the T10 folks on some issues SISWG has raised
>>> >recently, such as modifiable block lengths, 16-byte block length
>>> >granularity, and finding space for a crypotographic authenticator.
>>> >
>>> > - Bob Nixon
>>
>>--
>>John Lohmeyer Email: lohmeyer@t10.org
>>LSI Logic Corp. Voice: +1-719-533-7560
>>4420 ArrowsWest Dr.
>>Colo Spgs, CO 80907
P1619.pdf