RE: next meeting?
June 1 and 4 OK, preference for June 1. June 2&3 not good.
-----Original Message-----
From: james Hughes [mailto:james_hughes@stortek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:09 AM
To: plotkin@DECRU.COM
Cc: Steven.Sletten@SUN.COM; james Hughes; 'SISWG'; Clement Kent
Subject: Re: next meeting?
This is a bad week for me for an all day meeting. How about June 1-4?
On May 4, 2004, at 10:56 AM, Serge Plotkin wrote:
> June 14-18 week is better for me as well.
>
> -serge
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-p1619@listserv.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-stds-p1619@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Clement Kent
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 6:38 AM
> To: Steven.Sletten@SUN.COM; SISWG
> Subject: RE: next meeting?
>
> Steve, nothing is decided so far as I know. Jim Hughes will be in
> Colorado the week of June 9 so was proposing to phone in; Fabio also
> mentioned the conflict with T11. It's not a great week for me either
> so I was planning to phone in too.
>
> We had suggested June 9 to overlap the IA meetings at West Point,
> which Jack Cole is attending. However, I wonder how many SISWG members
> would prefer to aim for a week later (week of June 14-18)?
>
> Any comments?
>
> Clement
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Sletten [mailto:Steven.Sletten@SUN.COM]
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:11 PM
> To: SISWG
> Subject: next meeting?
>
>
> The minutes of the last meeting proposed having a face to face on June
> 9. That is the week of the T11 meetings and in particular, June 9 is
> when they have their security meeting. The meeting is in Chicago. June
> 10 or 11 would be a better date. Has anything been decided?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve