Re: next meeting?
I actually prefer the 4th.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Sletten <Steven.Sletten@Sun.COM>
To: Clement Kent <C.Kent@KASTENCHASE.COM>
CC: james Hughes <james_hughes@stortek.com>; plotkin@DECRU.COM
<plotkin@DECRU.COM>; SISWG <stds-p1619@majordomo.ieee.org>
Sent: Tue May 11 13:14:57 2004
Subject: Re: next meeting?
Have not heard any more about the meeting. May I suggest Colorado as a venue
on June 1.
Clement Kent wrote:
June 1 and 4 OK, preference for June 1. June 2&3 not good.
-----Original Message-----
From: james Hughes [ mailto:james_hughes@stortek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:09 AM
To: plotkin@DECRU.COM
Cc: Steven.Sletten@SUN.COM; james Hughes; 'SISWG'; Clement Kent
Subject: Re: next meeting?
This is a bad week for me for an all day meeting. How about June 1-4?
On May 4, 2004, at 10:56 AM, Serge Plotkin wrote:
June 14-18 week is better for me as well.
-serge
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-p1619@listserv.ieee.org
[ mailto:owner-stds-p1619@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Clement Kent
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 6:38 AM
To: Steven.Sletten@SUN.COM; SISWG
Subject: RE: next meeting?
Steve, nothing is decided so far as I know. Jim Hughes will be in
Colorado the week of June 9 so was proposing to phone in; Fabio also
mentioned the conflict with T11. It's not a great week for me either
so I was planning to phone in too.
We had suggested June 9 to overlap the IA meetings at West Point,
which Jack Cole is attending. However, I wonder how many SISWG members
would prefer to aim for a week later (week of June 14-18)?
Any comments?
Clement
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Sletten [ mailto:Steven.Sletten@SUN.COM]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:11 PM
To: SISWG
Subject: next meeting?
The minutes of the last meeting proposed having a face to face on June
9. That is the week of the T11 meetings and in particular, June 9 is
when they have their security meeting. The meeting is in Chicago. June
10 or 11 would be a better date. Has anything been decided?
Thanks,
Steve