Re: Rogaway EME technology - UC Case 2003-087
Jim,
This Wednesday at 2/11 is fine with me. My phone number (direct line) is
below.
Best regards,
Doug
At 01:58 PM 10/2/2004 -0400, James Hughes wrote:
>Doug: This is fine. The original at IEEE-SA is enough.
>
>P1619: This is the "reasonable/non-discriminatory" letter for EME.
>
>I would suggest that we have a phone meeting (in preparation to the in
>person meeting at the end of the month) Wednesday Oct 6th at 2pm Eastern,
>11am Pacific. Comments on this time?
>
>Thanks
>
>jim
>
>
>
>On Sep 30, 2004, at 11:59 AM, Doug Crawford wrote:
>>Jim,
>>
>>Please find attached both the IEEE signed letter of assurance form as well
>>as a separate letter of assurance on UC letterhead. Please let me know if
>>a hard copy original of the signed letter and/or form is needed and if so,
>>what mailing address it should be sent to.
>>
>>
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Doug
>> At 07:09 AM 9/21/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>> >All I am looking for is the patent-assurance letter.
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >Jim
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Phillip Rogaway <rogaway@cs.ucdavis.edu>
>> >To: Doug Crawford <doug.crawford@ucop.edu>; Hughes, James P
>> ><HugheJP@LOUISVILLE.STORTEK.COM>
>> >Sent: Tue Sep 21 02:36:19 2004
>> >Subject: Re: Rogaway EME technology
>> >
>> >Hi Doug and Jim,
>> >
>> >Just to clarify something -- what I've been urging isn't for
>> >UC's patent-assurance letter to contain a specific offer, but
>> >that we put out a separate offer letter around the same time.
>> >
>> >
>> >With kind regards,
>> >phil
>> >
>> >
>> >On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:52:33 -0700, "Doug Crawford"
>> ><doug.crawford@ucop.edu> said:
>> > > Hello Jim,
>> > >
>> > > This message is directed to you wearing your IEEE hat.
>> > >
>> > > I'm working on getting the patent letter out to the IEEE and am
>> clear on
>> > > the concept of non-exclusive reasonable terms aspect of the letter and
>> > > have
>> > > gotten decent acceptance from the signature authority here that this
>> > > should
>> > > not be a problem.
>> > >
>> > > However, Phil suggested that the letter would be more persuasive if we
>> > > could put a figure, such as $50k one-time fee in the letter. To that
>> > > end,
>> > > I would appreciate hearing of any experience or insight you would
>> have on
>> > > such a fee as it relates to similar technologies or other technologies
>> > > adopted (or not!) by the IEEE.
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > >
>> > > Doug
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > .
>> > > Doug Crawford
>> > > Licensing Officer
>> > > University of California
>> > > Office of Technology Transfer
>> > > 1111 Franklin Street, 5th Floor
>> > > Oakland, CA 94607-5200
>> > >
>> > > Direct Line: (510) 587-6035
>> > > Main Number: (510) 587-6000
>> > > Fax: (510) 587-6090
>> > >
>> > >
>
>
>
>
Doug Crawford
Licensing Officer
University of California
Office of Technology Transfer
1111 Franklin Street, 5th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607-5200
Direct Line: (510) 587-6035
Main Number: (510) 587-6000
Fax: (510) 587-6090