Re: Telephone meeting.
Jim,
That date/time is fine for me. Please confirm when all have agreed.
Also, what specifically will be addressed during the phone conference so
that I can be prepared?
Thanks,
Doug
At 08:29 AM 10/5/2004 -0400, James Hughes wrote:
>The consensus is that Wed is bad and Fri is good. I suggest Friday Oct 8th
>at 2pm Eastern, 11am Pacific?
>
>Thanks
>
>jim
>
>>At 01:58 PM 10/2/2004 -0400, James Hughes wrote:
>> >Doug: This is fine. The original at IEEE-SA is enough.
>> >
>> >P1619: This is the "reasonable/non-discriminatory" letter for EME.
>> >
>> >I would suggest that we have a phone meeting (in preparation to the in
>> >person meeting at the end of the month) Wednesday Oct 6th at 2pm Eastern,
>> >11am Pacific. Comments on this time?
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >jim
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Sep 30, 2004, at 11:59 AM, Doug Crawford wrote:
>> >>Jim,
>> >>
>> >>Please find attached both the IEEE signed letter of assurance form as
>> well
>> >>as a separate letter of assurance on UC letterhead. Please let me
>> know if
>> >>a hard copy original of the signed letter and/or form is needed and
>> if so,
>> >>what mailing address it should be sent to.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Best regards,
>> >>
>> >>Doug
>> >> At 07:09 AM 9/21/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>> >> >All I am looking for is the patent-assurance letter.
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks
>> >> >
>> >> >Jim
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >From: Phillip Rogaway <rogaway@cs.ucdavis.edu>
>> >> >To: Doug Crawford <doug.crawford@ucop.edu>; Hughes, James P
>> >> ><HugheJP@LOUISVILLE.STORTEK.COM>
>> >> >Sent: Tue Sep 21 02:36:19 2004
>> >> >Subject: Re: Rogaway EME technology
>> >> >
>> >> >Hi Doug and Jim,
>> >> >
>> >> >Just to clarify something -- what I've been urging isn't for
>> >> >UC's patent-assurance letter to contain a specific offer, but
>> >> >that we put out a separate offer letter around the same time.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >With kind regards,
>> >> >phil
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:52:33 -0700, "Doug Crawford"
>> >> ><doug.crawford@ucop.edu> said:
>> >> > > Hello Jim,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > This message is directed to you wearing your IEEE hat.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I'm working on getting the patent letter out to the IEEE and am
>> >> clear on
>> >> > > the concept of non-exclusive reasonable terms aspect of the
>> letter and
>> >> > > have
>> >> > > gotten decent acceptance from the signature authority here that
>> this
>> >> > > should
>> >> > > not be a problem.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > However, Phil suggested that the letter would be more
>> persuasive if we
>> >> > > could put a figure, such as $50k one-time fee in the
>> letter. To that
>> >> > > end,
>> >> > > I would appreciate hearing of any experience or insight you would
>> >> have on
>> >> > > such a fee as it relates to similar technologies or other
>> technologies
>> >> > > adopted (or not!) by the IEEE.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Best regards,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Doug
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > .
>> >> > > Doug Crawford
>> >> > > Licensing Officer
>> >> > > University of California
>> >> > > Office of Technology Transfer
>> >> > > 1111 Franklin Street, 5th Floor
>> >> > > Oakland, CA 94607-5200
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Direct Line: (510) 587-6035
>> >> > > Main Number: (510) 587-6000
>> >> > > Fax: (510) 587-6090
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>Doug Crawford
>>Licensing Officer
>> University of California
>> Office of Technology Transfer
>> 1111 Franklin Street, 5th Floor
>> Oakland, CA 94607-5200
>>
>>Direct Line: (510) 587-6035
>> Main Number: (510) 587-6000
>> Fax: (510) 587-6090
>