Re: 1619: LRW collision probabilities
All:
I will be at crypto. The conference runs until 12:30pm and the HASH
workshop starts at 2pm. I will be happy to get together to talk, but
this is only 1hour 30 minutes and without lunch.
We can meet over dinner or during the mid day break on Tuesday.
We can decide to miss the last 6 papers. They are:
- Scalable Secure Multiparty Computation, Ivan Damgård and Yuval Ishai
- Algebraic Geometric Secret Sharing Schemes and Secure Multi-Party
Computations over Small Fields, Hao Chen, Ronald Cramer
- Automated Security Proofs with Sequences of Games, Bruno Blanchet
and David Pointcheval
- On Robust Combiners for Private Information Retrieval and Other
Primitives, Remo Meier and Bartosz Przydatek
- On the Impossibility of Efficiently Combining Collision Resistant
Hash Functions, Dan Boneh and Xavier Boyen
- On the Higher Order Nonlinearities of Algebraic Immune Functions,
Claude Carlet
- New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security without Collision-
Resistance, Mihir Bellare
On Aug 14, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Matt Ball wrote:
> Technically, according to the workgroup by-laws
> (<http://www.siswg.org/P1619Procs.pdf>), a 30-day notice is required
> before setting up a face-to-face meeting. However, I think it might
> be useful to have an informal meeting (make no official decisions)
> on Thursday morning (after CRYPTO and before NIST hash bash).
>
> I'm not going to CRYPTO, but might make it to the NIST Hash Bash.
> I've been wanting to talk to some NIST folks about hash-based
> key transform...
>
> -Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stds-p1619@IEEE.ORG [mailto:stds-p1619@IEEE.ORG]On Behalf Of
> Laszlo.Hars@SEAGATE.COM
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:24 PM
> To: SISWG
> Subject: Re: 1619: LRW collision probabilities
>
>
> Shai wrote:
>> It seems that there is a fair number of us that will be present
>> in Crypto next week. Can we schedule a face-to-face meeting over
>> there
>> instead of the one that was canceled today?
>
> OK with me, if we can find a room with speaker phones for the rest
> of the
> WG. -Laszlo