Re: [IEEE_P1619] [P1619.1] D20 Available
Matt,
I suspect that you will receive comments as part of the WG ballot, so
you need to factor in a comment disposition cycle into this schedule.
Given our experience with the 1619 draft, I also think it would be a bit
ambitious to start the call for the ballot pool until we see the nature
of the comments.
-Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Ball [mailto:matt.ball@ieee.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:39 AM
To: STDS-P1619@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [IEEE_P1619] [P1619.1] D20 Available
Hi All,
Attached is P1619.1/D20. I'd like to make a motion in next week's
P1619.1 meeting that we use this draft as the starting point for a
15-day working group ballot. In total, this would give you all three
weeks to do an in-depth review of this standard before we enter sponsor
ballot (and do another in-depth review).
If we can start collecting the sponsor ballot pool at the beginning of
next week, we could time it so the sponsor ballot starts immediately
after the working group ballot ends. This would let us finish the first
sponsor ballot round before the August 17th submission deadline.
Does this sound like a good idea, or should we slip a cycle and aim for
October submission to IEEE?
As usual, comments are welcome!
--
Thanks!
Matt Ball
Quantum Corporation
4001 Discovery Drive, Suite 1100
Boulder, CO 80303
Work: 720-406-5766
Cell: 303-717-2717