Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-P1619] Enterprise Storage Forum article gives P1619/.1/.3 a good review



Hi Laszlo,

Like any interview, the word choice isn't always the best, and the
context doesn't always translate. I would agree that 'optimal' works a
little better.

Cheers,
-Matt

- Original message -
Dear Matt, We see the statement below repeated ...



On 5/6/08, Laszlo Hars <Laszlo.Hars@seagate.com> wrote:
> Dear Matt,
>
> We see the statement below repeated in different forums:
> "The  only  negative feedback I've heard about IEEE 1619 is by a large hard
> disk manufacturer that does not believe the encryption mode is suitable for
> hard disks," said Ball.
>
> If  you refer to Seagate's comments, it is not the right interpretation. We
> meant  that  P1619  was  designed  for  transparent  (external)  encryption
> modules,  which  keeps  the data layout unchanged. The standard text itself
> says that. For disk encryption there is no need for keeping the data layout
> unchanged,  therefore  we  have a much larger choice of tools. The security
> model  is  also  different:  we  can  trivially  prevent  the access to the
> ciphertext,  except  after  destructing the drive. This one-time ciphertext
> access allows simpler, faster encryption modes.
>
> Therefore, P1619 is "suitable", only not *optimal* for disk drives.
>
> Laszlo Hars
>
>
>
>
>              Matt Ball
>              <matt.ball@IEEE.O
>              RG>                                                        To
>              No Phone Info             STDS-P1619@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>              Available                                                  cc
>
>                                                                    Subject
>              05/06/2008 01:18          [STDS-P1619] Enterprise Storage
>              PM                        Forum article gives P1619/.1/.3 a
>                                        good review
>
>              Please respond to
>                  Matt Ball
>              <matt.ball@IEEE.O
>                     RG>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Drew Robb just published a very positive article on the P1619-series
> standards:
>
> http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/continuity/features/article.php/3742881
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
> Matt Ball, IEEE P1619.x SISWG Chair
> M.V. Ball Technical Consulting, Inc.
> Phone: 303-469-2469, Cell: 303-717-2717
> http://www.mvballtech.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewvball
>

-- 
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com

Thanks!
Matt Ball, IEEE P1619.x SISWG Chair
M.V. Ball Technical Consulting, Inc.
Phone: 303-469-2469, Cell: 303-717-2717
http://www.mvballtech.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewvball