|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
I apologize for missing the telecon. But I have a question. Previously, the only thing keeping the last two full sentences of this excerpt of 1619 was the words "shall" in the 1st and "should" in the 2nd, This draft proposes to replace "should" with "shall" in the 2nd of those sentences -- which only then begs the question of why the modified 2nd sentence (i.e. with the "shall" is not a direct contradiction of the sentence which precedes it?
Phone; (520) 352-9146