Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[IEEE_ISSAA] ISSAA Normative vs Informative



Stu,
 
Looking at the Functionality section, it is the place where the normative words should go, and it is almost all normative.  The problem is that there is no specification of the overall process.  The introductory paragraph provides only a background description.  In the Model section, the introductory paragraph provides a generic descriptive of the components, but nothing that approaches normative, and nothing on the process.
 
We need a subsection in section 5 that specifics the order of using the components, when to start at what we designate as the beginning, and when to start some place else.  Currently, there are no words that even say: "... when finished with this component, go on to that one...", and where is the process finished.  Also, it would help a lot if Figure 1 was moved to the beginning of Section 5, to accompany the overall specification.
 
Section 6.2 comes close to specifying the overall process.  It could be rephrased to be more normative and copied/moved to the beginning of Section 5.
 
T. Scott Ankrum
Software Engineering Center, MITRE
 
Life: "It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." Shakespeare
 
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Ankrum;T.;Scott
FN:T. Scott Ankrum (ankrums@mitre.org)
ORG:MITRE Corporation, The;Software Engineering Center W908
TITLE:Senior Software Systems Engineer
TEL;WORK;VOICE:+1 (703) 983-6127
TEL;WORK;FAX:+1 (703) 983-1339
ADR;WORK:;MITRE-1 2H127;7515 Colshire Drive;McLean;VA;22102-7508;United States of America
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:MITRE-1 2H127=0D=0A7515 Colshire Drive=0D=0AMcLean, VA 22102-7508=0D=0AUnite=
d States of America
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:ankrums@mitre.org
REV:20060728T141412Z
END:VCARD