Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

P1788.1 Motion M007.01 PASSES



P1788.1,

Voting on Motion M007.01 concluded on Thursday, 26 January.  Nathalie’s call is below.

Final tally:  Yes - 35; No - 0; Needed for quorum - 29.

The motion PASSES.

Comments during the voting at below.

George Corliss
P1788.1 Voting Tabulator



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Kreinovich, Vladik" <vladik@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26
> Date: January 5, 2017 at 5:15:31 PM CST
> To: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I vote for. 
> 
> My minor concern is with the title of the appendix: Not required features. I am not a native speaker, but when I was learning English, my teacher would correct me if I would write something like that, maybe we should reword it or at least add a dash between not and required? Or maybe it is legit and/or iat least is legit in standards? 



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: John Pryce <PryceJD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26
> Date: January 8, 2017 at 4:52:11 PM CST
> To: Vladik Kreinovich <vladik@xxxxxxxx>, Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ned Nedialkov <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I also vote for, but I agree with Vladik that "Not-required" seems clearer. An alternative is the single English word "Unneeded". Ned, does it have the intended meaning in this context? I hope this small change can be a friendly amendment.
> John Pryce



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26
> Date: January 10, 2017 at 9:27:43 AM CST
> To: John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vladik Kreinovich <vladik@xxxxxxxx>, Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
> 
>> On Jan 8, 2017, at 17:52, John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> I also vote for, but I agree with Vladik that "Not-required" seems clearer.
> 
> 
> Yes, will update to No-required. 
> 



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Andreas Rauh <andreas.rauh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Motion 007.01: YES
> Date: January 9, 2017 at 1:22:27 AM CST
> To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> my vote is YES. I agree with the rewording suggestion made by Vladik and John.
> 
> Best regards
> Andreas




> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Michel Hack <mhack@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Motion 007.01: YES
> Date: January 20, 2017 at 3:05:27 PM CST
> To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I vote Yes for the proposed Level3/Level4 section of the document.
> 
> I concur with the editorial suggestions about replacing "Not required".
> One suggestion was "Unneeded" -- but perhaps we could be precise and say:
> 
>  Features of the full standard not required in the 1788.1 standard.
> 
> Another editorial fix for a typo on line 3 of page 28:
>  in parenthesis.  ->  in parentheses.
> 
> Michel.





Begin forwarded message:

From: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: YES
Date: January 23, 2017 at 9:39:13 AM CST
To: <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>

My vote for this motion is YES.

I would suggest to insert a sentence at line 2 of page 28 (Annex A) if it is not too late.

"IEEE P1788.1 satisfies all General Requirements of IEEE Std 1788-2015 and
hence it can be considered a flavor of that standard. This Annex lists all features of
the set-based flavor of IEEE Std 1788-2015 that are not ...."

Best Regards,
 -Dima



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Kreinovich, Vladik" <vladik@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: Motion M007.01: YES
> Date: January 23, 2017 at 9:46:55 AM CST
> To: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx>, "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> I don't think it is a flavor, many things from 1788 are on purpose omitted here, this was, in my understanding, the whole purpose, maybe I  am missing something
> 




Begin forwarded message:

From: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: YES
Date: January 23, 2017 at 10:52:42 AM CST
To: <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>

Vladik,

1788 consists of two parts:
- general requirements common for all flavors;
- set-based flavor.

Many things of set-based flavor are omitted.
All 1788 general requirements are in the 1788.1.

Or maybe I missed some requirement ?

 -Dima








> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26
> Date: January 5, 2017 at 5:00:39 PM CST
> To: Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> I wish you all the best for 2017.
> 
> It is now time to vote on Motion M007.01, until January 26.
> 
> Best regards
> 	Nathalie Revol
> 
>> On 22 Nov 2016, at 16:18, Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> 
>> Motion M007.01 has been moved by Ned Nedialkov and seconded by John Pryce:
>> its content is that the last part, Level 4, and Annex A of P1788.1 are accepted.
>> The related text is attached.
>> 
>> Thank you to Ned and John.
>> 
>> The discussion period begins and will end on December 13, 2016.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> 	Nathalie Revol
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Nathalie Revol                                                  INRIA Grenoble - Rhone Alpes
>> LIP - projet AriC                                                tel: (33) 4 72 72 85 03
>> Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon            fax: (33) 4 72 72 80 80
>> 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France                     Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>                         https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__perso.ens-2Dlyon.fr_nathalie.revol_&d=DgIFAg&c=S1d2Gs1Y1NQV8Lx35_Qi5FnTH2uYWyh_OhOS94IqYCo&r=zbKTKV51PGVwSJ8WG7DcOhnGyecdLP4osK_mdwDQbgU&m=0Z0FxFmDtqjTXm-Zy0AOdxQuDN1DLKeSxk0a694ZTAY&s=yF-5TJpMYBMHt-AP6tXyNaGDofHE5d6eqSYBTHGazaQ&e= 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Nathalie Revol                                                  INRIA Grenoble - Rhone Alpes
> LIP - projet AriC                                                tel: (33) 4 72 72 85 03
> Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon            fax: (33) 4 72 72 80 80
> 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France                     Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx
>                          https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__perso.ens-2Dlyon.fr_nathalie.revol_&d=DgIFAg&c=S1d2Gs1Y1NQV8Lx35_Qi5FnTH2uYWyh_OhOS94IqYCo&r=zbKTKV51PGVwSJ8WG7DcOhnGyecdLP4osK_mdwDQbgU&m=0Z0FxFmDtqjTXm-Zy0AOdxQuDN1DLKeSxk0a694ZTAY&s=yF-5TJpMYBMHt-AP6tXyNaGDofHE5d6eqSYBTHGazaQ&e= 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: level4.pdf
Description: level4.pdf