Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: P1788: Next?



Natalie,

> it is not clear to me that 1788.1 is a flavor of 1788…

Part 1 "General Requirements" of the 1788 standard defines requirements for a flavor.
Which of these requirements are not met by 1788.1 ?

Best Regards,
  -Dima

----- Original Message -----
From: Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx, george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 8:53:22 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
Subject: Re: P1788: Next?

Yes, Ned, please incorporate the minor comments from the last vote.
I do not think we need to vote on them, as they are really minor.

Except the one concerning the “flavor”: it is not clear to me that 1788.1 is a
flavor of 1788… Shall we discuss this point?

If no, then we can start the discussion + vote on the whole document.
Ned, can you move it?

Best regards
	Nathalie

> On 31 Jan 2017, at 16:14, Nedialkov, Ned <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I should include the minor comments from the last vote. Shall we vote on them?
> Then shall we vote on the whole document? We have accepted all parts. 
> 
> Regards,
> Ned
>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 09:54, Corliss, George <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> P1788,
>> 
>> What are our next steps?
>> 
>> Let’s FINISH this.
>> 
>> George Corliss

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Nathalie Revol                                                  INRIA Grenoble - Rhone Alpes
  LIP - projet AriC                                                tel: (33) 4 72 72 85 03
  Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon            fax: (33) 4 72 72 80 80
  69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France                     Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx
                               http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/nathalie.revol/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------