754 Working Group Mail Archive

Thread Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: Suggestion of annex D
- From: Guillaume Melquiond
RE: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: 1-914-784-7648
RE: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Eric Postpischil
Re: Suggestion of annex D
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: Suggestion of annex D
- From: Christoph Quirin Lauter
Re: Suggestion of annex D
- From: Peter Henderson
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Peter Henderson
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: David James
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Ivan Godard
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Peter Henderson
Re: Zeroes and infinities
- From: Thorsten Siebenborn
Re: Zeroes and infinities
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: Zeroes and infinities
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Zeroes and infinities
- From: Jeff Kidder
Re: Zeroes and infinities
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Zeroes and infinities
- From: Thorsten Siebenborn
Re: Zeroes and infinities
- From: Nick Maclaren
Zeroes and infinities
- From: Thorsten Siebenborn
RE: Suggestion of annex D
- From: David James
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Definition of infinity
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: David James
Suggestion of annex D
- From: Florent de Dinechin
Definition of infinity
- From: Florent de Dinechin
Re: 754R next recirculation ballot comments
- From: Jean-Michel Muller
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Malcolm Cohen
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Nick Maclaren
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Fred J. Tydeman
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: David James
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Malcolm Cohen
Draft inconsistencies (was: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!)
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: David James
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: David James
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: David James
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Nick Maclaren
RE: Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: David James
Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: 1-914-784-7648
Specifying signs when f(0)=0
- From: Eric Postpischil
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Mike Cowlishaw
RE: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: David James
Re: More Transendental questions
- From: Peter Henderson
Re: FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: Florent de Dinechin
FW: Transcendental function tables: comments welcome!
- From: David James
Re: More Transendental questions
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: More Transendental questions
- From: Peter Henderson
Re: x^y as both x and y approach zero
- From: Nick Maclaren
Forward of Prof Kahan's: x^y as both x and y approach zero
- From: ieee2007
Re: More Transendental questions
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: More Transendental questions
- From: Jonathan Thornburg
Re: More Transendental questions
- From: Peter Henderson
My reply to comments from Jim Thomas
- From: 1-914-784-7648
Your May 18 comments on proposed new 6.12.3 text
- From: 1-914-784-7648
RE: scaledProd, over and underflow
- From: Golliver, Roger A
Re: scaledProd, over and underflow
- From: David Hough 754R work
scaledProd, over and underflow
- From: David James
Re: 754R and reproducibility
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: Huck, Jerry (BCS)
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: 1-914-784-7648
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: 1-914-784-7648
Re: 754R and reproducibility
- From: Vincent Lefevre
RE: 754R and reproducibility (a few questions...)
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility
- From: 1-914-784-7648
RE: 754R and reproducibility
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility
- From: 1-914-784-7648
RE: 754R and reproducibility
- From: David James
RE: 754R and reproducibility
- From: David Hough 754R work
RE: 754R and reproducibility
- From: David James
The other trig functions...
- From: David James
754R and reproducibility
- From: David Hough 754R work
Re: 754R next recirculation ballot comments
- From: Eric Postpischil
RE: A vague specification
- From: David James
Re: More transcendental questions (actually, NaN types)
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: More transcendental questions (actually, NaN types)
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: More transcendental questions (actually, NaN types)
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: A vague specification
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: A vague specification
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: More transendental questions
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: More transendental questions
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: More transendental questions
- From: Vincent Lefevre
Re: More transcendental questions (actually, NaN types)
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: More transcendental questions (actually, NaN types)
- From: 1-914-784-7648

Mail converted by MHonArc