[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DPD vs. BID hardware

To: "Crawford, John H" <john.h.crawford@xxxxxxxxx>, "Michel Hack (1-914-784-7648)" <hack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "stds-754" <stds-754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: DPD vs. BID hardware
From: "Mori, Nobuyoshi" <nobuyoshi.mori@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:48:52 +0200
In-reply-to: <24331DEBF3D45C4E8BDAA5E9B331EDC03971F2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-754>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO STDS-754>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-754-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-754-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-754-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcaW0TxmXl2CUQRuRMmVIvX8gZh+yQAAILmwAJasSNA=
Thread-topic: DPD vs. BID hardware

John Crawford wrote on Fr 23.06.2006 16:50:

No, Michel, everyone does not agree that DPD is more hardware-friendly
than BID.


We, as an independent Software vendor, came to 
the conclusion after one year investigation on 
the issue, that DPD Is more Intel and AMD HW 
friendly format than BID for the reasons I 
posted previously. 

- Nobu

References:
- DPD vs. BID hardware
  - From: Crawford, John H

Prev by Date: The EU corrections are in...
Next by Date: RE: BID vs. DPD performance
Previous by thread: DPD vs. BID hardware
Next by thread: are we ready?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread