[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Tuesday's IEEE 754r style review.

To: <stds-754@xxxxxxxx>, <stds-754@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Tuesday's IEEE 754r style review.
From: "Golliver, Roger A" <roger.a.golliver@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:23:40 -0700
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-754>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO STDS-754>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-754-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-754-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-754-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-754@xxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcbIYtN3Hxo/+7/2RzygYG1ItQDg9w==
Thread-topic: Tuesday's IEEE 754r style review.

Title: Tuesday's IEEE 754r style review.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:00 AM US Pacific Time
Where 916-356-2663, Bridge: 3, Passcode: 8306941
Bridge has been reserved for 3 hours.
I've looked up the instructions, and *91 will extend the bridge if needed.
Roger

Prev by Date: Re:specifies vs. requires [note to editor]
Next by Date: Thursday's IEEE 754r style review.
Previous by thread: Re: [Stds-754] IEEE 754 Revision, comments from IFIP WG 2.5
Next by thread: Thursday's IEEE 754r style review.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread