[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
RE: [Stds-754] Comments on draft 1.2 of 17 Sept ... NaN payloads
All,
I suspect we'll have to leave this as murky as it currently stands...
I believe that accurately describes the intent of the committee.
That statement _certainly_ does not reflect my opinion.
I don't mind having options and flexibility, but they
should be explicit and clear, not murky by intent.
DVJ
-----Original Message-----
From: stds-754@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-754@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike
Cowlishaw
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 1:42 PM
To: Michel Hack (1-914-784-7648)
Cc: stds-754@xxxxxxxx; stds-754@xxxxxxxxxxx; stds-754
Subject: Re: [Stds-754] Comments on draft 1.2 of 17 Sept ... NaN
payloads
So payloads are really neither here nor there...
I suspect we'll have to leave this as murky as it currently stands...
I believe that accurately describes the intent of the committee.