[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: COBOL, IEEE Std 754-2008 Signaling NaN



-----Original Message-----
<snip>
The only exception is IBM that prints NaNQ
and NaNS (which does not conform to Standard Fortran).
-----end Original Message-----

Are you talking about a platform where IBM claims to have a Standard conforming 
Fortran?  I am most familiar with IBM platforms that do NOT claim to have a 
Fortran product that conforms to current Standards.

Of course, if this is a place (as someone else indicated) that the Standard 
says is "processor dependent", then this doesn't really matter.


754 | revision | FAQ | references | list archive