| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Jonathan, Thanks for your agile on-the-fly edits during yesterday’s call. The new diagram seems to reflect what we agreed during that call. I’ve just a couple touch-ups to suggest. 1. The “Symbol error ratio” and “Bit error ratio” test outputs should be presented with equivalent appearance. Specifically, they should both be shown within boxes or without boxes. My interpretation of the other boxes is that each represents a hardware entity. However, these test outputs do not. Therefore I recommend removal of the box around “Bit error ratio”. 2. The format of arrow pointing to “Symbol error ratio” is unlike all others. Unless there is a good reason for this distinction, I’d recommend making it the same as the others. Regards, Paul From: Jonathan King [mailto:jonathan.king@xxxxxxxxxxx] Dear all Following today’s MMF ad hoc review of the Stressed receiver conformance test diagram which will go into clause 95, here is an updated figure, implementing all the changes we’d agreed to during the call. The last slide is the crudely edited diagram we ended up with by the end of the call today, the first slide is the cleaned up version. Please let me know Thank you all for your participation this morning ! Best wishes jonathan |