Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[10GBASE-T] Technical feasibility: power




I've been reading this forum with great interest, and I believe that
power is the proverbial elephant in the room here.  Others, I think,
would agree.  In a July 31 email, Xiaopeng wrote:

"Due to the complexity increase of the DSP part and the analog part,
even using 65nm technology for digital circuit and using SiGe technology
for analog circuit, to reach 100m on CAT-7, the estimated power of the
transceiver (assume it is practically feasible) will be a number that
can surprise you.  I believe more and more data will be given in the
following meeting to show you the reality."

5 Watts is much, much below the surprising number that I have in mind. 
If this were going to be a 5 Watt part I would have no worries.

Sreen and others have stated that the DSP required for 10G would require
6.7 times as many taps as a 1G Phy.  And those taps will be running 6.7
times as fast (833 MHz vs. 125 MHz).  Therefore the power increase is
around 44X.

Others have claimed that a 10G Phy could be implemented with many fewer
gates but have not, as far as I can tell, provided any evidence to
support this claim.

Let's assume that today's 750 mW 1G Phy dissipates 400 mW of DSP power. 
That means the digital portion of a 10G Phy, in today's .13u technology,
would dissipate 17W.

With respect to analog power, the presentation at the following URL

http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/10GBT/public/mar03/jones_2_0303.pdf

mentions the TC1200 ADC from Telasic (for reference, the URL is

http://www.telasic.com/live/products/10bit1GSPS.shtml

).

The presentation lists the TC1200 at 10 bits of resolution with 8 bit
ENOB.  From Telasic's website, the TC1200 consumes 5.5 W.

A 10G Phy would require 10 bit ENOB, and would require 4 ADCs.  Assuming
a very efficient future implementation of a 10 bit ENOB ADC would
dissipate the 5.5W that today's 8 ENOB ADC dissipates, we're talking
about 22W for the ADCs alone.  Let's assume 2 more Watts for the
remaining analog circuitry.

Suppose we can reduce the 17W of digital power by a factor of 4 with two
process shrinks (to 65 nm in around 5 years).  That's 4W of digital
power dissipation.

So we're talking about 24W of analog power and 4W of digital power in a
"future" (5 years hence) Phy, a whopping total of 28W!

I would argue that this level of power dissipation materially affects
the technical feasibility of the program, and therefore must be
considered before it leaves the Study Group phase.

-- 
Keith Vertrees                  Vativ Technologies, Inc.
Vice President of Engineering   4350 Executive Drive, Ste. 200
Voice (858)362-0850             San Diego, CA 92121
Fax   (858)362-0855             keith@vativ.com