|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
I agree that the WG should be locking down these key parameters, however the decision on the number of bits per symbol will depend on the coding gain assumed and that will depend on....
... so the discussion that has been running over the reflector needs to be continued and resolved ASAP.
Booth, Bradley wrote:
Feedback from ISO/IEC WG 3 meeting
Dear Task Force members,
I attended the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 meeting last week. One important point of feedback that I received was if the Task Force could select the number of bits per symbol that would provide a lot more direction to WG 3. We have been talking about the number of bits per symbol period for over a year, and I believe that it would be prudent of the Task Force to lock that number down. I would like the Task Force to lock this number down at the March Plenary, so please consider this a request for presentations to support what our decision should be on the number of bits per symbol period.
Chair, IEEE P802.3an Task Force