Re: [10GBT] More on the PAM12 emissions
I have a better idea: please withdraw the PAM12 proposal and let us all
focus on the PAM8 proposal that doesn't have any of these issues.
>From: Glenn Golden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: [10GBT] More on the PAM12 emissions
>Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:48:26 -0600
>sailesh rao writes:
> > Same response as to Jose.
>I'm sorry Sailesh, I feel that the onus is on you now now. Read my
>email more carefully and I believe you'll see why your response to
>Jose is incorrect.
> > Please go ahead and fix it yourself. Your observations don't negate the
> > point I've been trying to make for the past three days - if we keep
> > the same patterns repeatedly as proposed in powell_1_0704.pdf, spiky
> > happens in the PSD.
>Yes, that's right, spikey stuff happens in the PSD. And the peaks of
>the spikey stuff are 23 dB below the data, where no one doing EMI
>testing can see them.
>Please fix the errors we've told you about, set the resolution bandwidth
>in accordance to the EMI testing standard, and then show us the ripple.
MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – FREE