Re: [10GBT] Symbol rate for PAM8 proposal
I still haven't seen the updated spreadsheet that correspond to the plenary
presentations. For instance, the spreadsheet I have shows two flavors of
PAM12 with 810Ms/s and 820Ms/s symbol rates.
Please send me the updated spreadsheet you have and I'll check if the
entries for PAM8 are all correct. I suggest we take this offline to avoid
>From: Sanjay Kasturia <SKasturia@TERANETICS.COM>
>Reply-To: "IEEE P802.3an" <STDS-802-3-10GBT@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
>Subject: Re: [10GBT] Symbol rate for PAM8 proposal
>Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:30:11 -0700
>Are there any other entries in the phy comparison spreadsheet that you
>would like to change? I will put the symbol rate change in and mail out
>the spreadsheet to the reflector.
>cell (650) 704-7686
>office (408) 653-2235
>From: stds-802-3-10gbt@IEEE.ORG [mailto:stds-802-3-10gbt@IEEE.ORG] On
>Behalf Of sailesh rao
>Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 8:17 AM
>Subject: [10GBT] Symbol rate for PAM8 proposal
>Based on the excellent technical input I've received from many cabling
>experts in this task force, I would like to reduce the back channel
>overhead in the PAM8 proposal from the current 4% to about 1%. In
>conjunction, I would like to officially reduce the symbol rate on the
>PAM8 proposal from 1Gs/s to 952.381Ms/s. There are minor changes
>necessary in the data framing to accomodate this reduction, and details
>will be presented at the next interim.
>I would like to thank all the cabling experts, and especially Alan
>Flatman, for taking the time to advance this technical process.
>Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
Donít just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!