Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [10GBT] Number of PAM12 proposals?


What is your interpretation of this motion? Would you rule that it is fine
to have a second PAM12 column addressing a proposal other than
powell_1_0704.pdf in the spreadsheet?


>From: "Booth, Bradley" <bradley.booth@INTEL.COM>
>Reply-To: "IEEE P802.3an" <>
>Subject: Re: [10GBT] Number of PAM12 proposals?
>Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:43:52 -0700
>The motion was as follows:
>Motion: Task force narrow consideration of 10GBASE-T baseline approach
>to the PAM8 and PAM12 proposals described in rao_1_0704.pdf and
>Moved   K Brown
>Second  J Babanezhad
>Hearing no discussion the chair took a voice vote.
>The motion carried.
>Does that help you with the interpretation?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: stds-802-3-10gbt@IEEE.ORG [mailto:stds-802-3-10gbt@IEEE.ORG] On
>Behalf Of sailesh rao
>Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 6:12 PM
>Subject: [10GBT] Number of PAM12 proposals?
>Hi All,
>There appear to be two PAM12 columns in the latest Task force
>Does this mean I need to study two different PAM12 proposals to find all
>issues with them?
>Didn't we pass a motion to restrict ourselves to one PAM8 proposal
>(rao_1_0704.pdf) and one PAM12 proposal (powell_1_0704.pdf) at the July
>Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!

Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and