[10GBT] Pair to pair unequal SNR problem
- To: STDS-802-3-10GBT@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
- Subject: [10GBT] Pair to pair unequal SNR problem
- From: Eric Wang <eric_r_wang@YAHOO.COM>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:59:28 -0800
- Approved-By: bradley.booth@INTEL.COM
- Comments: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=nViP77/AwzfL4fQ4hbOW1yHkRztcVisDkLTaz5nPmrS9LM1MOe/Og/e2pqaqebs1uK7UeC0BFo05E+9VnMC6rx41/cg1yAoUYp+y4tR6/xwVYMOZsQGUAC/bkumpM0ISyRJr80OQUkwBbNhpWAEYL6/2QF/SHJV6auE6TgpOAtQ= ;
- Reply-To: Eric Wang <eric_r_wang@YAHOO.COM>
- Sender: "IEEE P802.3an Reflector" <stds-802-3-10gbt@IEEE.ORG>
On page 10 of powell_2_0205.pdf, what you are saying is that the unequal
SNR problem is basically caused by pair to pair AFEXT differences.
Usually AFEXT is unpredictable, and the system maybe has already crashed
before it can detect which pair has the worst SNR. So I am just wondering
how interleaving and framing will help. If the unequal SNR is caused by
insertion loss differences, it is sure that simple methods, such as
interleaving, will be helpful.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around