Re: [8023-10GEPON] FW: [8023-10GEPON] [POWER_BUDGET] ad hoc group meeting - CORRECTE D
Dear Robert and Marek,
Thank you for your arrangement.
I have some opinions about this issue.
I think our target is 29dB maximum insertion loss so far (See a result of
the straw poll in November meeting, which is described in page 6 and 8 of
http://www.ieee802.org/3/av/public/2006_11/3av_0611_closing.pdf).
So, at first, we need to decide the power budget, and it is derived from
the spread sheet which Marek is making now.
I made a slide which described a relation between some numbers, which were
defined in Tanaka-san presentation in November, and the spread sheet.
Also, I made a slide which described ITU-T terminology for your information.
Can we start to define the power budget?
Sincerely yours,
Tsutomu TATSUTA
At 00:47 07/01/27, Lingle, Jr, Robert (Robert) wrote:
>There was an error in my first email w/r/t to the time of the Wednesday 1/31
>call. It will be held at 9AM to enable European participation.
>****************************************************************************
>************
>All,
>
>I appreciate the expression of interest I received in the Power Budget ad
>hoc from 10 individuals. I expect more than that to join the calls.
>
>The first meeting will be held Tuesday, January 30 at 7PM EST, which I
>believe is
>Wednesday January 31 at 9AM in Tokyo. This meeting would likely be
>attended by anyone in Japan, Korea, or the US West Coast.
>
>I will also hold a follow-up call on Wednesday January 31 at 9AM EST
>for anyone on the East Coast of the US or in Europe who wishes to
>participate. I believe that will be 2 or 3PM for Europe cities.
>
>Toll-free in US 866-263-8899
>Outside US 816-249-6061
>Conf. Code 7707985015
>
>I propose that the ad hoc will meet four times between now and March
>Plenary, with following goals:
>
>1/30 & 31 - purpose is to review a summary of results and conclusions from
>previously prepared materials, discuss what seem like most likely solutions
>for 29dB power budgets, and to generate questions that need answers to turn
>preliminary conclusions into consensus conclusions based on cost and
>technical feasibility. I am preparing that presentation to review in
>consultation with others. Ad hoc participants will be expected to take
>action items from the first meeting to bring back answers to the questions
>raised.
>
>week of 2/12 - purpose is to bring back answers to questions raised in
>previous meeting and debate their meaning, with goal of focusing down on one
>PMD proposal one which to analyze further for the 29 dB power budget case.
>
>week of 2/26 - purpose is to finish up any unanswered questions for 29dB
>power budget solution, and begin to discuss whether the 29 dB solution can
>form the basis for reduced cost PMDs for lower power budget cases?
>
>week of 3/5 - review and revise a presentation for March plenary
>
>Robert
>
>Robert Lingle, Jr.
>Fiber Design and Transmission Research
>OFS Corporate R&D, Atlanta
>404-886-3581 (cell)
>770-798-5015 (office)
Definition070129.ppt