I was referring to 2 commercially available (not experimental) PIN-PD
ROSAs. Both had sensitivity of -21dBm for BER of 1x10E-12.
I will be glad to provide the datasheets to anyone who requests
it. Because of IEEE policy, I cannot upload it to the server.
From: 윤빈영 [mailto:byyun@etri.re.kr]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:37 AM
To: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] D/S power budget & wavelenght plan
Dear Akihiro Otaka,
My proposal does not consider FEC to meet
the power budget.
I heard that a ROSA(PIN-PD) with -21dBm was reported experimentally.
I am not sure if the aggressive PIN-PD can be commercially achieved near future.
I think that we have to keep
the consistency with the existing standard if
possible.
So I suggest that the FEC should be just
optional like 1G EPON.
Sincerely yours,
-----원본 메시지-----
보낸 사람: "Akihiro Otaka"
<ootaka@ANSL.NTT.CO.JP>
보낸 날짜: 2007-09-04 오전 11:24:12
받는 사람:
"STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG"
<STDS-802-3-10GEPON@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
참조:
제목: Re: [8023-10GEPON] D/S power budget &
wavelenght plan
Dear, Mr. Yoon
This is Akihiro Otaka in NTT.
Thank you for the presentaiton.
I have a simple question.
I understand that your proposal is based on the aggressive
PIN and APD without FEC.
How do you think about the difference between;
1) normal PD with FEC
and
2) aggressive PD without FEC?
Best regards,
Akihiro Otaka
At 10:32 07/09/04, BIN YEONG YOON wrote:
>Dear all,
>
> We need a compromise between two camps.
>I think that DS power budget & wavelength plan are tightly coupled.
>So I address the two issues in my proposal.
>
>Here is my contribution attached.
>I tried to reflect the opinions of two camps on it as much as I can.
>
>I need many supporters to make a progress for our group.
>Please, let me know it if you want to be a supporter.
>I will be happy to get your feedback about my proposal.
>
> Sincerely yours,