| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear All, I have an observation. Since the IEEE
values are the normative ones, it seems more correct to make the IEEE values drive
the ITU values, rather than the current situation where the ITU values are the
entry parameters and the IEEE are derived from the ITU values. I’ve looked at it, and it seems that
there are only two pairs of IEEE – ITU cells that need to be “reversed”
in this way. The attached diagram shows this, with the
reversed arrows colored in blue. At some point, we might want to incorporate
this change in the sheet. But, just to emphasize, this doesn’t change a
single number that appears. It is only the way that the numbers are
calculated. Just an observation… Sincerely, Frank Effenberger. From: Hajduczenia,
Marek [mailto:marek.hajduczenia@NSN.COM] Dear all, attached please find the updated version of the
channel link model spreadsheet (v2.2) along with the slideshow to be presented
at January meeting. I would like to point Your attention to a new tab
which was added in the spreadsheet i.e. "Model parameter definitions"
- with the definitions of all the parameters used in the model along with the
proposed indication whether the given parameter should be normative or
informative. Note that the normative / informative allocation is tentative and
subject to change should any discrepancies be noted. Please do not hesitate to post Your comments on both
the spreadsheet and the presentation itself. I would like to thank all the participants of the
channel link model ad hoc, who devoted their time to develop and extend the
functionality of this tool. Best wishes Marek
Hajduczenia (141238) |
10G EPON link budget discussion Reversed connections.ppt