Re: [8023-10GEPON] Changes to Clause 45 / D2.0
Geoff,
The answer is "no". The draft is technically complete as it was submitted. The proposed changes are an improvement only.
Regards
Marek Hajduczenia (141238)
NOKIA SIEMENS Networks S.A.
System Architect - COO BBA DSLAM R&D
Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora, Portugal
* marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxx
(+351.21.416.7472 4+351.21.424.2337
-----Original Message-----
From: ext Geoff Thompson [mailto:gthompso@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: quarta-feira, 23 de Julho de 2008 4:52
To: Hajduczenia, Marek (NSN - PT/Amadora)
Cc: STDS-802-3-10GEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [8023-10GEPON] Changes to Clause 45 / D2.0
Marek-
Does this mean that the TF forwarded a draft to WG Ballot that was not
technically complete?
(and thus did not meet 802.3 requirements for forwarding draft to WG Ballot.)
Geoff
At 02:50 AM 7/22/2008 , Hajduczenia, Marek (NSN - PT/Amadora) wrote:
>
>Dear all,
>
>In the light of the discussion during the last meeting, it was identified
>that Clause 45 is missing registers for 10/1GBASE-PRX FEC parameters. I
>would like to contribute initial version of the draft of new subclauses to
>be added to 45.2.1.92 - 45.2.1.95. Note that the proposal is tentative and
>subject to discussion as well as corrections. I plan to submit this in the
>form of a comment against D2.0.
>
>If You have any comments, please feel free to post them with the reference
>to the attached document. Note that on page 16, line 37, reference is made
>to FEC error indication for 1 Gb/s link, which I was not able to locate
>anywhere in clause 65. Any hints where it might go ? Here is the text I am
>referring to "(see @@Subclause 77.2.3.3@@ and @@any_reference_in_clause_65@@)"
>
>Thank You for Your time
>
>Regards
>
>Marek Hajduczenia (141238)
>NOKIA SIEMENS Networks S.A.
>System Architect - COO BBA DSLAM R&D
>
>Rua Irmãos Siemens, 1, Ed. 1, Piso 1
>Alfragide, 2720-093 Amadora, Portugal
>
>* marek.hajduczenia@xxxxxxx
>(+351.21.416.7472 4+351.21.424.2337