Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [10GMMF] TP3 Meeting reminder Aug 31.

Hi TP3ers,

This is attempt 2 on a message I sent yesterday, prior to our meeting

Best Regards


-----Original Message-----
From: LAWTON,MIKE (A-England,ex1)
Sent: 31 August 2004 16:40
To: ''
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 Meeting reminder Aug 31.

Hi Everyone,

Here are my thoughts for discussion on point 5. below.

5. Review work list of addtional items                    Mike

Goal: Define simple, low cost but rigorous testing designed to support interoperability

Process to Follow
Review Lew's proposal presentation along with alternative approaches.

1. List Rx Stressors required to represent the channel:-
        a. Fiber loss/dispersion
        b. Connector loss/dispersion
        c. Time varying factors
        d. Modal Noise
        e. RIN
        f. Jitter
        g. Optical signal conditioning

a+b is being handled with Petre's work.

Who can support c thru g?
Is there anything we can simply tick off the list either with a small amount of work or by accepting what Lew has already proposed?

2. Representation within Link Budget
        - how should it be represented within the link budget ... do we need to do more work to support this
        - How significant is it?
                - is the effect swamped by other factors?

3. Emulation with the stressed Eye Rx Test
        Possible approaches:-
                a. ignore
                b. loss
                c. sinusoidal interferer (single amplitude and frequency)
                d. multiple sinusoidal interferers
                e. impulse response emulation - 2 ray, 3 ray, tapped delay line, Gaussian, Butterworth filter
                f. ??

4. Validation of Chosen Technique
                a. How does it capture the worst case?
                b. How practical is it?
                        - repeatability
                        - calibration
                        - ??
                c. Does it avoid uneccessary complexity?

5. Known assumptions/non idealities and their significance
                a. what simplifications have been made? how significant are they?

6. Other Questions???

Best Regards


> Michael Lawton wrote:
> >Hi Everyone,
> >
> >This is just a short meeting reminder and dial-in info for
> the next TP3 call.
> >
> >Tuesday Aug 31 9am CA, 12 NY, 5pm UK, 6pm Germany
> >
> >Dial in Details
> >===============
> >International Direct Dial (650) 599-0374
> >
> >Meeting ID:                     801803
> >Number of Participants:         25
> >
> >Current Agenda Items
> >====================
> >1. Attendees
> >2. Review notes from last meeting
> >3. Update on experimental results regarding non-idealities
> in E-O-E     Ahbhijit
> >4. Discussion on parameter fitting for the ISI generator
>                    Peter
> >5. Review work list of addtional items
>                    Mike
> >6. Walk in items
> >
> >Talk to you all then.
> >
> >Best Regards
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >
> >