Re: [10GMMF] the task 4 meeting today.

[Yu Sun <yusun@xxxxxxxx>]

Dear Tom,

 

Thank you very much for the comments. The purpose of this work is to compare the change of the PIE due to different launches. I think the delta of PIE is more meaningful at this moment. I will be very careful, when we present the data.

 

 

Thanks again.

 

Best regards,

 

Yu

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Tom Lindsay
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 11:12 AM
To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [10GMMF] the task 4 meeting today.

 

Hi Yu -

 

Please be careful with the use of 30 psec for Tx in your simulations of PIE metrics. We have used 30 psec to help determine ways to emulate fibers for TP3 testing, but there is no expectation that 30 psec will be used in TP2 specification or an actual TP3 test condition. At the end of Ottawa, the thinking was that if a Gaussian pulse is used, its rise and fall times should not be less than 47.1 psec. TP2 studies are underway to help determine actual requirements.

 

Thanks, Tom

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Yu Sun

To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org

Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 6:19 AM

Subject: [10GMMF] the task 4 meeting today.

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

Piers helped me to upload the updated PIE results using Cambridge 108 fibers. Piers, thank you very much.

 The file can be found at http://ieee802.org/3/aq/public/upload/PIEcamparisonNov2.pdf. I hope we have a chance to go over it at today’s task 4 meeting. I would appreciate your comments and suggestions.

 

The dial in information of today’s call is

 

1888-296-6500

ID: 188249

 

Best regards,

 

Yu