Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [10GMMF] TP3 call Agenda: Meeting reminder Dec 7

To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [10GMMF] TP3 call Agenda: Meeting reminder Dec 7
From: Tom Lindsay <tom.lindsay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 07:22:40 -0800
Organization: ClariPhy Communications
References: <77ECF00D05EF564B84E400221A2C0C6B01820164@bueller>
Reply-To: "IEEE P802.3aq 10GBASE-LRM"<stds-802-3-10gmmf@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stds-802-3-10gmmf@xxxxxxxx

Sudeep - all looks good, except doesn't the final PIE value seem a bit lower than the actual expected cumulative penalties? Does this mean that quasi-symmetrical pulses are less stressful in general? If so, how much confidence does this test give that other higher PIE waveforms will be tolerated without error?

Thanks, Tom

----- Original Message -----

From: Sudeep Bhoja

To: STDS-802-3-10GMMF@listserv.ieee.org

Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 8:14 PM

Subject: Re: [10GMMF] TP3 call Agenda: Meeting reminder Dec 7

Mike,

Please see attached my slides on
the informative sensitivity test for
discussion on the call tommorow.

Sudeep

References:
- Re: [10GMMF] TP3 call Agenda: Meeting reminder Dec 7
  - From: Sudeep Bhoja

Prev by Date: Re: [10GMMF] Task 2 and task 4 meeting, 8th Dec 04
Next by Date: Re: [10GMMF] TP3 Meeting minutes, November 23rd
Prev by thread: Re: [10GMMF] TP3 call Agenda: Meeting reminder Dec 7
Next by thread: Re: [10GMMF] Suggestions on generating TP3 stressed sensitivity t est ISI paramters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread