Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[10GMMF] TP3, 3.6dB ISI penalty criteria


I am embarrassed to say that I missed the fact in Sudeep's 12/20 TP3
presentation, there was added "to the sieve" a requirement that each IPR
meet a 3.6dB ISI penalty screening criterion (based on ewen_1_1104). I
didn't realize it till looking at the Vancouver presentation, bhoja_1_0105,
page 2.


Would it be too much trouble to produce plots showing which IPR's were not
included in the pre-, post-, and quasi-symmetric cases due to that criteria?


Robert Lingle, Jr
Fiber Design and Development
OFS R&D, Atlanta, GA

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim McVey [mailto:jim.mcvey@FINISAR.COM]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 7:00 PM
Subject: [10GMMF] TP3 No meeting notice: February 1, 2005 No meeting

Hello all TP3 people,

Based on conversations with various people at the Vancouver meeting, I am
proposing that we discontinue the weekly TP3 call until the work required by
our sub-group requires further calls.

At Vancouver, we completed the receiver test sections with the simple and
comprehensive stressed receiver tests and the receiver jitter tolerance
test.  We set parameters in support of these tests.  I know that there is
some continuing e-mail traffic about these parameters, but I feel that it
has not coalesced yet. I would suggest that we use the e-mail reflector,
work on studies and presentations in support of aspects of the discussions,
and when ready move for the TP3 conference call to happen again.

If you feel strongly about the call now, or think it is required in the
future, then please send me your agenda items.

Thank you all of you for your help in making so much progress in advancing
the 802.3aq standard.

- Jim McVey

+ 1 650 740 7732