Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Interface reality check

Dear Paul,

> To support T1X1 other types of frames aside from Ethernet format are
> required. Since the format must be determined before the CRC can be located
> using any part of the existing Ethernet frame to determine the format is
> not a technique which works.

This is easy.

Define a different frame type using the <type/length> field.

In the first two data bytes of the payload of your newly defined "T1X1"
packet, put your T1X1 <length><type><crc> doodad.  This give you exactly
what you want, and is redundantly protected by the CRC32 of the data

You see, once you get issued your own <type/length> value for T1X1 packets,
you can define the packet structure any way you desire.  If you want, you
can make it use exactly T1X1 bit patterns, omit CRC32, etc.

The mechanism is quite flexible.  The only issue is whether you can get
enough support to get the mechanism standardized.

Best regards,
Rick Walker