Re: 1300 nm VCSELs
I think that the suggested price differential between
edge and surface emitters is profoundly misunderstood.
At ~1M devices, if someone were to give the dice away,
the total dollar svings would barely make it into two
digits, be it VCSEL, F-P, or DFB. The cost of fibre
coupling the devices, particularly into smf, is
generally greater than that of the device. If people
are waiting for a "magic bullet" component, they're
going to have a long wait.
I'd also take announcements of 1.3u VCSEL's which are
almost ready for prime time with a grain of salt.
We've had another pumped part which has been almost
there for a year.
--- Mike Bennett <bennett@xxxxxx> wrote:
> In order to rekindle discussion regarding PMDs I
> offer the following
> As an end user, I had taken the position that only a
> short wave VCSEL
> based PMD could be the lowest cost and thus included
> in the set of PMDs
> that go into the first draft of the standard. At
> the plenary I had
> heard discussion of 1300 nm VCSELs but told the
> shipping dates of such
> components could be from several months to years
> away. Essentially, to
> summarize what I as well as other end users have
> said on the reflector,
> we want "cheap and simple" interfaces for the short
> reach application
> space with simple meaning no mode conditioners and,
> some would argue,
> serial rather than CWDM or WWDM. Since the
> Novacrystals VCSEL has a
> bandwidth of 2.5 Gbps, its clear this would mean it
> would have to be
> used as some kind of WWDM PMD. I'd like to know if
> anyone has actually
> demonstrated the feasibility of such a PMD or if
> anyone is planning to
> present technical information regarding 1300 nm
> VCSEL based PMDs at the
> interim. Please forgive me if this has been
> discussed previously.
> Mike Bennett
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> (Berkeley Lab)
> E-mail: bennett@xxxxxx Phone: +1
> 510 486-7913
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.