Re: Comment on D2.0 Clause 49 Fig 49-11
Sorry all. My mistake... I read the "+" as an AND instead
of an OR logically. Nevermind.
Gordon Jacobs wrote:
> Hi Pat,
> Question/comment on Clause 49 sync header state machine:
> Defs say, "bad_sh_eq_thresh: Boolean variable which is set true
> when the number of invalid sync headers within a frame equals a
> threshold. The threshold is 1 when not in frame lock and 32
> when in frame lock"
> Fig 49-11 shows condition to go to 32_BAD state as
> sh_invalid_cnt = 32 + frame_lock = false.
> If frame_lock is false (not in frame lock) then shouldn't
> the compare for sh_invalid_cnt be to 1? (Is this an error
> held over from D1.1 where the compare was always to 32?).
> Gordon Jacobs
> Bravida Corp.