Re: Clause 49 /A/ /K/ /R/ on XGMII question
I was hoping you wouldn't steer this issue my way. You were doing great!
I didn't get involved because you were doing such a good job!
As you say, the Task Force has carefully considered the processing of
coding errors and decided upon the operation documented in D2.1. The
proper question to ask is whether something is wrong with the current
handling of errors. If nothing is wrong with the current operation, a
very strong case must be shown as to the benefits of alternate
operation. In any case, anyone wishing to make a change MUST submit a
comment since the draft comment period is now open.
> I'm not sure I understant what you are asking. The XGXS and X PCS have to
> distinguish between an all /A/s lane or a partial /A/s lane for purposes of
> monitoring alignment of the link. They don't _have_ to do this for decoding.
> However, as Rich wrote the clause, the clause does specify that behavior for
> decoding and the sub-task force chose to affirm that at the interim in
> January by rejecting a comment I had made suggesting doing it the other way.
> The important thing is this is not an important decision. As long as we are
> consistant across the layers it works either way and has minimal impact on
> I'm getting kind of tired of the subject and feel its being beaten to death.
> Please address any further questions about it to Rich. It is his clause. Or,
> if you want it changed, submit a comment.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boaz Shahar [mailto:boazs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 7:01 AM
> To: THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1); Steve Haddock; 'Grow, Bob';
> jgaither@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Clause 49 /A/ /K/ /R/ on XGMII question
> If so, why does the XGXS have to distinguish between /A/'s in a lane when
> one of the /A/ in the other lanes is erroneous to /A/ in a lane when all /A/
> are fine?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:pat_thaler@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:46 PM
> > To: Steve Haddock; 'Grow, Bob'; jgaither@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: Clause 49 /A/ /K/ /R/ on XGMII question
> > Steve,
> > The RS doesn't do anything with /E/s that occur during idle.
> > Actually, the
> > RS doesn't have any error counting facility. Therefore, it
> > doesn't matter
> > whether it treats an /A/ /K/ /R/ during idle as an /E/ or an /I/.
Richard Taborek Sr. Phone: 408-845-6102
Chief Technology Officer Cell: 408-832-3957
nSerial Corporation Fax: 408-845-6114
2500-5 Augustine Dr. mailto:rtaborek@xxxxxxxxxxx
Santa Clara, CA 95054 http://www.nSerial.com