Re: Clause 45: MDIO Electrical Specifications
Dear Eduward Turner,
I'm a new member.
I hope to know how to get the P802.3ae Draft2.0.
Edward Turner wrote:
> As you correctly point out, the conclusion of the MDIO Electrical ad-hoc was to
> recommend to IEEE P802.3ae that JEDEC JESD8-11 be adopted as the MDIO electrical
> interface. This is what I reported at the opening IEEE P802.3ae Task Force
> meeting in January and, as you point out, is recorded in the meeting minutes in
> the General Presentations section
> (http://www.ieee802.org/3/ae/public/jan01/minutes_0101.pdf - pages 15/16).
> Please note however that this was a report of the recommendation of the Ad-Hoc
> given at the start of the meeting. When the Clause 45 track met later in the
> week to resolve comments, the track discussed the ad-hoc's recommendation in
> relation to D2.0 comment #1115 and the conclusion of this discussion was a
> decision to use electricals based on JEDEC JESD8-11. These electricals are a
> 1.2v instance of JEDEC JESD8-11 with some additional parameters. This is
> documented in the comment resolution database against comment #1115
> (http://www.ieee802.org/3/ae/comments/d2.0/D2-0-Comments.pdf - Page 76) and was
> also reported by Ben Brown in his Logic Track report at the close of the IEEE
> P802.3ae Task Force meeting
> (http://www.ieee802.org/3/ae/public/jan01/brown_1_0101.pdf - Page 5).
Kim, Sahng-Beom / Korea Telecom
TEL : +82-42-870-8322
FAX : +82-42-870-8279
E-mail : ksbn@xxxxxxxx