RE: [802.3ae] Wan Interface Sublayer
Pardon my ignorance of IEEE procedures, but is there any chance that
this might be changed again, so that the clocks might not match? There is a
great difference in how we can set up MIBs based on whether or not it might
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roy Bynum [mailto:rabynum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 09:42 PM
> To: Ayers, Mike; 'stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [802.3ae] Wan Interface Sublayer
> As of Draft 3.1, the clock tolerances of the WAN PHY
> transmitter are the
> same as SONET and SDH Class B SRE and LRE receivers.
> Thank You,
> Roy Bynum
> At 04:16 PM 8/21/01 -0500, Ayers, Mike wrote:
> > > From: Roy Bynum [mailto:rabynum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 07:15 AM
> > > As for being able to transparently carry 10GbE WAN PHY over
> > > an optical
> > > network, no additional systems other than what already
> exists in the
> > > service provider infrastructure is required. Only if the
> WAN PHY is
> > > multiplexed into another transmission system other than 10G
> > > SONET or SDH is
> > > additional infrastructure needed, which is required
> regardless of the
> > > protocol or PHY.
> > So the clock and tolerances for WIS and SONET are the same.