Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802.3ae] Question about Clause 48 /D3.2




Thx.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:pat_thaler@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:27 PM
> To: Boaz Shahar; HSSG (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [802.3ae] Question about Clause 48 /D3.2
> 
> 
> Boaz,
> 
> It appears that the line in 48.2.4.4 did not get updated when 
> the table was
> changed - partly my fault since I made the comment that asked 
> for the table
> to be changed but didn't spot that there was a text line that 
> needed to be
> updated to match. I am submitting a ballot comment to delete 
> the sentence
> you quote form 48.2.4.4.
> 
> Regards,
> Pat
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boaz Shahar [mailto:boazs@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 12:26 AM
> To: HSSG (E-mail)
> Subject: [802.3ae] Question about Clause 48 /D3.2
> 
> 
> 
> Rich,
> My interpretation to lines 17-18 of table 48-2 is that while 
> TXC=1,  all the
> values of XGMII.TXD which are appearing in table 36-2 and not 
> explicitly in
> 48-2 are translated to PCS Code-Group according to table 36-2, and are
> defined as "Reserved XGMII Character" (According to the 
> "Description" Column
> in48-2). I suppose that if the intention was to translate it 
> to K30.7, it
> would be written explicitly, as was done in the next line for 
> "Any other
> value".
> 
> However, in page 315, section 48.2.4.4 says (L 18): "The PCS transmit
> process replaces all reserved XGMII control characters with /E/".
> 
> So, the question is what to do with the "Reserved XGMII 
> Characters" which
> are appearing in table 36-2 and not in table 48-2.
> 
> Thx.,
> Boaz
>