Thread Links |
Date Links |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |

*To*: hssg <stds-802-3-hssg@ieee.org>*Subject*: Scramblers are statically DC balanced?*From*: Dae Young KIM <dykim@ccl.chungnam.ac.kr>*Date*: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 15:26:25 +0900*Organization*: Chungnam Nat'l Univ., InfoCom Eng. Dept.*Sender*: owner-stds-802-3-hssg@majordomo.ieee.org

I happended to come across a statement made by 'Paul' (on behalf of Bartoff?) that 'Scramblers are statiscally DC balanced.' This statement is *wrong*. In line coding, DC-balance (or DC-free property) technically means: P1) There be no line spectrum at f=0; P2) There be a clear wide notch in the continous power spectrum. To understand this, one has to recall that there are two components in the power spectrum, aka power spectral density(psd); discrete part and continuous part. A discrete component (or line spectrum) indicates an existance of a determisnistic (ever lasting) signal wave of the frequency; in this case, a DC bias. The other continous part denotes a statistical average of the signal power at the frequency. Now, P1) is clear. No line spectrum. Good thing. Why then P2)? Why is P1) enough? The most popular reason is that many transmission links are either ac-coupled on the way through long distances or the physical link has a very poor transmission quality at low frequencies. Hence any of your power, though of continous compenent, at low frequecies will not properly pass through your link only to deteriate your receive signal quality, especially, in ISI(intersymbol interference) and drooping. What's the effect of scrambling? It clearly has a good effect in terms of the line spectrum. Scrambling destroys any possible repeated symbol patterns (or periodic patterns) which is the cause for the line spectral components. What about the continous part of the spectrum? The thing is that, by scrabling, your data get enough randomness in the pattern that it resembles the pseudo-random patterns, of which the autocorrelation function approaches the impluse, resuling in a flat and constant continous power spectrum. Therefore, properly scrambed symbol sequences does not generate a power notch at zero frequency; on the contrary, you get a finite power density at the frequecy. Therefore, Scrambled NRZ is NOT DC-balanced as interpredted according to the two criteria cited above. Whe talking about DC-balance in line coding, the real point is not P1) above, for that is out of the question. The point is whether you have a power null (wide open nutch like well) around zero frequency. One more reason why you would like to have small power near f=0 in optical transmission. I might be wrong, but what I heard off is, that the power near DC tends to heat your optical devices more than higher frequencies do, and such heat is harmful for many reasons, and thus DC-free property is seeked also in optical channels which, inherenly, is capable of transferring the DC component. Conclusion: Scrambling does not render DC-balance/DC-freedom. -- Regards, Dae Young http://ccl.chungnam.ac.kr/~dykim/

- Prev by Date:
**Re: HSSG** - Next by Date:
**Line rate and optical span** - Prev by thread:
**RE: Data rate standards vs internal switching standards]** - Next by thread:
**Line rate and optical span** - Index(es):