|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Referring to your list further below:
This is the only one on your list that is a proposal to P802.3ae.
talking with - it really should not be used.
I hope that clarifies things.
David W. Martin
+1 613 765-2901
+1 613 763-2388 (fax)
From: Rich Taborek [SMTP:email@example.com]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: WAN PHY name
I believe that you and I agree on something.
You said: "Ethernet over SONET/SDH is the standard that are being developed in
T1X1 and ITU."
I said: "Ethernet Over SONET represents a specific proposal to IEEE P802.3ae to
map Ethernet to SONET."
I believe that the latest reference to the proposal identified in both our
statements above is embodied in:
that there have been many, many other presentations endorsing the same general
mapping given to IEEE P802.3ae over the course of the last several months.
Am I completely lost? Please tell me if the proposal referenced in the link
above is not an active proposal in front of IEEE P802.3? If it's not, then I
don't have to worry about it any more.
Please help me differentiate between all of the following:
b) Ethernet over SONET/SDH;
c) WAN compatible PHY being developed by the IEEE;
d) "Lite" version of SONET/SDH.
I apologize in advance for my ignorance and any confusion I have caused the
Roy Bynum wrote:
> You need to pay more attention, or if you have been paying attention,stop
> generating confusion. Ethernet over SONET/SDH is the standard that are
> being developed in T1X1 and ITU. The WAN compatible PHY is being developed
> by IEEE. The WAN compatible PHY proposal uses a "Lite" version of
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rich Taborek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: HSSG <email@example.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2000 12:57 PM
> Subject: Re: WAN PHY name
> > Jay, Martin,
> > I believe that Ethernet Over SONET represents a specific proposal to IEEE
> > P802.3ae to map Ethernet to SONET. Two problems with this:
> > 1) It is not a proposal endorsed by a majority of IEEE P802.3ae members
> > interested in meeting the WAN objectives, nevermind 75%;
> > 2) It is not applicable to supporting native Ethernet over the WAN in the
> > absence of SONET/SDH.
> > Best Regards,
> > Rich
> > --
> > firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > >
> > > How about EOS/S (Ethernet Over SONET / SDH)? The world extends beyond
> > > America.
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Richard Taborek Sr. Phone: 408-845-6102
> > Chief Technology Officer Cell: 408-832-3957
> > nSerial Corporation Fax: 408-845-6114
> > 2500-5 Augustine Dr. mailto:rtaborek@nSerial.com
> > Santa Clara, CA 95054 http://www.nSerial.com
Richard Taborek Sr. Phone: 408-845-6102
Chief Technology Officer Cell: 408-832-3957
nSerial Corporation Fax: 408-845-6114
2500-5 Augustine Dr. mailto:rtaborek@nSerial.com
Santa Clara, CA 95054 http://www.nSerial.com